Document Type : Research Article (s)

Authors

Food Evolution Research Laboratory, School of Tourism and Hospitality, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Food insecurity is increasing due to economic recession, resulting in childhood malnutrition, a risk factor for adult morbidities. Strategies to prevent and combat it are being implemented. This study aimed to evaluate the menus used in school feeding programs and their impact on the health and well-being of children in South Africa.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of nine primary schools in four South African provinces—Gauteng, Western Cape, North- West, and KwaZulu-Natal—was conducted between April 2022 and May 2022. Three schools were randomly selected per province, totaling 36 respondents—comprising a principal/NSNP coordinator, a teacher, and a food handler per school. An observational checklist was also employed. Weekly menus at each school were obtained, and dietary intake data were evaluated using the NutriSurvey application and the South African Food Composition table. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach in Atlas. Ti software, while Microsoft Excel was utilized for the checklist.
Results: The surveys indicated that in-school nutrition programs have positively impacted schoolchildren’s well-being and academic performance. Menu evaluation revealed that most National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) lunch meals did not provide up to 25-30% of the children’s recommended dietary allowance (RDA), but the Tiger Brands Foundation (TBF) breakfast augmented this by providing an additional 10-20% of the RDAs. Regarding breakfast meals, the highest mean RDA met per week was for calcium (21%), while Gauteng lunch had the highest mean RDA met values for most nutrients, including protein (15%), vitamin A (78%), vitamin B9 (37%), vitamin B12 (140%), vitamin C (33%), and iron (29%). The health checklist showed that all respondents affirmed that the children were generally healthy.
Conclusion: The school feeding menus contribute to the percentage of RDAs met for essential nutrients and the well-being of children, although the contribution is not significant, as not all RDAs meet the 25-30% requirement. However, incorporating foods like meat (despite being expensive), eggs and fruits into the menus could enhance protein supply and increase the percentage of RDAs met.

Highlights

Eridiong Onyenweaku: (Google Scholar), (PubMed)

 

 

How to Cite: Kesa H, Onyenweaku E. Menu Evaluation versus Health and Well-being of Children Participating in School Feeding Programmes in South Africa. Int. J. School. Health. 2024;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.30476/INTJSH.2023.99878.1342.

Keywords

  1. UNICEF, WHO, World Bank. Levels And Trends Child Malnutrition: Key Findings of The 2020 Edition of the Joint Child Malnutrition Estimate. Geneva WHO. 2020;24(2):1-16. ##
  2. Lake L, Shung-King M, Delany A, Hendricks MK. CHILDREN AND COVID-19 ADVOCACY BRIEF Prioritise children - from response to recovery; 2021. ##
  3. WHO. Technical paper Regional strategy on nutrition 2010 – 2019. Development; 2010. ##
  4. Dorward A, Guenther B, Sabates-Wheeler R. Linking Social Protection and Support to Small Farmer Development. FAO; 2008. ##
  5.   Wenhold F, Kruger S, Muehlhoff E. Nutrition for school-age children and adolescents. In Steyn NP, Temple N, editors. Community nutrition textbook for South Africa – A rights-based approach; 2007. ##
  6. DPME/DBE. Report on the Implementation Evaluation of the National School Nutrition Programme: Full Report; 2016. ##
  7. Maluleke T, Shisana O, Labadarios D, Rehle T, Simbayi L, Zuma KK, et al. South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES-1). HSRC Press; 2021. ##
  8. Tomlinson M. School feeding in east and southern Africa : Improving food sovereignty or photo opportunity ? Regional Network for Equity in Health in Southern Africa. Syst Res. 2007;(46). ##
  9. UNICEF. Undernutrition contributes to half of all deaths in children under 5 and is widespread in Asia and Africa, 2015. Available from: http://data.unicef.org/nutrition/malnutrition. ##
  10. Hendricks MK, Goeiman H, Hawkridge A. Promoting health growth: Strengthening nutritional support for mothers, infants and children. In Berry L, Biersteker L, Dawes A, Lake L, Smith C, editors. South African Child gauge; 2013. ##
  11. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, et al. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: What can be done and at what cost? Lancet. 2013;382(9890):452-477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4. PubMed PMID: 23746776. ##
  12. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Grantham-McGregor S, Black M, Nelson CA, Huffman SL, et al. Inequality in early childhood: Risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet. 2011;378(9799):1325-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60555-2. PubMed PMID: 21944375. ##
  13. Desai A, Smith LE, Mbuya MN, Chigumira A, Fundira D, Tavengwa NV, et al. The shine trial infant feeding intervention: Pilot study of effects on maternal learning and infant diet quality in rural Zimbabwe. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;61:S710–S715. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ846. ##
  14. Umeokonkwo AA, Ibekwe MU, Umeokonkwo CD, Okike CO, Ezeanosike OB, Ibe BC. Nutritional status of school age children in Abakaliki metropolis, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1994-5. PubMed PMID: 32145745; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7060553. ##
  15. May J, Witten C, Lake L, Skelton A. The slow violence of malnutrition. In May J, Witten C, Lake L, editors. South African Child Gauge; 2020. ##
  16. Kristjansson EA, Gelli A, Welch V, Greenhalgh T, Liberato S, Francis D, et al. Costs, and cost-outcome of school feeding programmes and feeding programmes for young children. Evidence and recommendations. International Journal of Educational Development. 2016;48(C):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.11.011. ##
  17. Bundy D, Burbano C, Grosh ME, Gelli A, Juke M, Lesley D. Rethinking school feeding; 2009. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7974-5. ##
  18. Graham L, Hochfeld T, Stuart L, Van Gent M. Evaluation study of the National School Nutrition Programme and the Tiger Brands Foundation in-school breakfast feeding programme in the Lady Frere and Qumbu districts of the Eastern Cape. Johannesburg; 2015. ##
  19. Department of Basic Education. National guidelines for the implementation, monitoring, and reporting on the national school nutrition programme. Pretoria; 2010. ##
  20. Rendall-Mkosi R, Wenhold F, Sibanda NB. Case study of the National School Nutrition Programme in South Africa. Pretoria; 2013. ##
  21. Scientific Advisory Panel, Healthy active kids: South Africa report card; 2014. Available from: https://www.vitalityschools.co.za/schools/educationaltools/research.do. ##
  22. Vorster H. Revised food-based dietary guidelines for South Africa: Challenges pertaining to their testing, implementation and evaluation. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2013;26:S3-S4. ##