Document Type : Research Article (s)

Authors

1 Boromarajonani College of Nursing Chiang Mai, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand

2 Boromarajonani College of Nursing Songkhla, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand

Abstract

Background: Cyberbullying among secondary school students is increasing worldwide, causing psychological distress and adverse academic performance. Schools in Thailand often lack comprehensive prevention strategies. This study aimed to develop a school–family participatory cyberbullying prevention program and evaluate changes in students’ cyberbullying knowledge and response skills following its implementation.
Methods: A quasi-experimental, single-group pretest–posttest developmental study was conducted in Chiang Mai, Thailand, from May to October 2022. Eighteen stakeholders (school leaders, teachers, parents, and community representatives) co-developed the program, which was subsequently implemented with 45 students in Grades 7–9. For data collection, self-report measures comprising demographic information, validated cyberbullying knowledge questionnaires, and response skills questionnaires were employed. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS version 24.
Results: The developed program comprised four core activities: (1) building resilience against cyberbullying, (2) promoting positive communication, (3) creating a cyberbullying-free community, and (4) fostering sustainability. After participation, mean knowledge scores increased from 12.95 (SD=2.44) to 16.82 (SD=1.82) (P<0.001), with high knowledge levels rising from 4.45% to 75.56% (P=0.012). Response skill scores improved from 3.30 (SD=0.42) to 4.26 (SD=0.33) (P<0.001), with high-level responses increasing from 8.89% to 95.55% (P<0.001).
Conclusions: The school–family collaboration program effectively enhanced students’ knowledge and response skills to cyberbullying and showed promise for broader implementation to promote safer digital environments.

Highlights

Roshinee Oupra: Google Scholar

Eakachai Kantawong: Google Scholar

Keywords

  1. Anthony R, Young H, Hewitt G, Sloan L, Moore G, Murphy S, et a Young people’s online communication and its association with mental well-being: results from the 2019 student health and well-being survey. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023;28(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/camh.12610. PubMed PMID: 36385571. ##
  2. Amirpour B, Takallou F, Valadbeigi D. Investigating the dimensions of victimization in sixth-grade male students and its association with subjective well-being in school and school bonding. Int J School Health. 2024;11(1):13-21. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2023.100110.1347. ##
  3. John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, Montgomery P, Stewart A, Wood S, et al. Self-Harm, Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and Young People: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4):e129. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9044. PubMed PMID: 29674305; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5934539. ##
  4. Zhu C, Huang S, Evans R, Zhang W. Cyberbullying Among Adolescents and Children: A Comprehensive Review of the Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Preventive Measures. Front Public Health. 2021;9:634909. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909. PubMed PMID: 33791270; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8006937. ##
  5. Zhao N, Yang S, Zhang Q, Wang J, Xie W, Tan Y, et al. School bullying results in poor psychological conditions: Evidence from a survey of 95,545 subjects. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1279872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279872. PubMed PMID: 38328372; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10847557. ##
  6. National Statistical Office. The 2024 survey on ICT use among Thai children and youth. Bangkok: Ministry of Digital Economy and Society; 2024. Available from: https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2025/20250808095847_86212.pdf. ##
  7. Children and Youth Council of Thailand. Online safety manual for children and young people 2025. Bangkok: UNICEF Thailand; 2025. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/thailand/reports/online-safety-manual-children-and-young-people-2025. ##
  8. Boonchooduang N, Louthrenoo O, Charnsil C, Narkpongphun A. Cyberbullying and emotional-behavioral functioning among Northern Thai adolescents. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2019;17(3):12877-81. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.17.003011. ##
  9. Lertratthamrongkul W. Cyberbullying among secondary school students: Prevalence, problem-solving and risk behaviors. NEU Academic and Research Journal. 2021;11(1):275-89. Thai. ##
  10. Kurniasih N, Kuswarno E, Yanto A, Sugiana D. Media literacy to overcome cyberbullying: Case study in an elementary school in Bandung, Indonesia. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2020;3564. ##
  11. Samoh N, Boonmongkon P, Ojanen TT, Samakkeekarom R, Jonas KJ, Guadamuz TE. “It's an ordinary matter”: Perceptions of cyberbullying in Thai youth culture. Journal of Youth Studies. 2019;22(2):240-255. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2018.1495835. ##
  12. Panumaporn J, Hongsanguansri S, Atsariyasing W, Kiatrungrit K. Bystanders’ behaviours and associated factors in cyberbullying. Gen Psychiatr. 2020;33(6):e100187. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100187. PubMed PMID: 32524075; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7245368. ##
  13. Huang Y, Espelage DL, Polanin JR, Hong JS. A Meta-analytic Review of School-Based Anti-bullying Programs with a Parent Component. International Journal of Bullying Prevention. 2019;1(5):32-44. doi: 10.1007/s42380-018-0002-1. ##
  14. Hicks JF, LeClair B, Berry S. Using Solution-Focused Dramatic Empathy Training to Eliminate Cyber-Bullying. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health. 2016;11(3):378-90. doi: 10.1080/15401383.2016.1172533. ##
  15. Cohen JM, Uphoff NT. Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development. 1980;8(3):213-235. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(80)90011-X. ##
  16. Schlehofer MM, Parnell D, Ross A. The Stand Up to Bullying (SU2B) Project: Participatory Action Research with Middle School Youth. Global Journal of Community Psychology. 2018;9(1):1-9. doi: :10.17161/gjcpp.v9i1.20715. ##
  17. Saengcharoensap K, Rujiprak V. Cyberbullying Among University Students in Thailand. Thammasat Review. 2021;24(2):41-58. Thai. ##
  18. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. ##
  19. Best JW. Research in education. 3rd ed. USA: Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs; 1981. ##
  20. Sittichai R, Smith PK. Bullying and Cyberbullying in Thailand: Coping Strategies and Relation to Age, Gender, Religion and Victim Status. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research. 2018;7(1):24-30. doi: 10.7821/naer.2018.1.254. ##
  21. Christens BD, Speer PW. Community organizing: Practice, research, and policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2015;9(1):193-222. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12014. ##
  22. Essuman A. Improving education delivery through community–school partnership: Is the “social contract” being weakened? A study of two rural schools. International Journal of Educational Management. 2019;33(6):1336-1351. doi: 10.1108/IJEM-06-2018-0175. ##
  23. Oscós-Sánchez MÁ, Lesser J, Oscós-Flores LD, Pineda D, Araujo Y, Franklin B, et al. The effects of two community-based participatory action research programs on violence outside of and in school among adolescents and young adults in a Latino community. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(2):370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.004. PubMed PMID: 33221186. ##
  24. Laursen B, Veenstra R. Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. J Res Adolesc. 2021;31(4):889-907. doi: 10.1111/jora.12606. PubMed PMID: 34820944; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8630732. ##
  25. Watts LL, Abo Hamza E, Bedewy DA, Moustafa AA. A meta-analysis study on peer influence and adolescent substance use. Current Psychology. 2024;43(5):3866-3881. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04944-z. ##
  26. Kantawong E, Kao T-SA, Robbins LB, Ling J, Anderson-Carpenter KD. Adolescents' Perceived Drinking Norms Toward Alcohol Misuse: An Integrative Review. West J Nurs Res. 2022;44(5):477-492. doi: 10.1177/0193945921998376. PubMed PMID: 33739201. ##
  27. Thornberg R, Pozzoli T, Gini G, Hong JS. Bullying and repeated conventional transgressions in Swedish schools: How do gender and bullying roles affect students’ conceptions? Psychology in the Schools. 2017;54(9):1189-1201. doi: 10.1002/pits.22054. ##
  28. Hamm MP, Newton AS, Chisholm A, Shulhan J, Milne A, Sundar P, et al. Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People: A Scoping Review of Social Media Studies. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):770-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0944. PubMed PMID: 26098362. ##