Document Type : Research Article (s)

Authors

1 Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences, Jahrom University, Jahrom, Iran

2 Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

3 Department of sports science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Urmia university, Urmia, Iran

4 Bachelor of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran

Abstract

Background: Confident and proficient participation in physical activities throughout life relies on mastering Fundamental Motor Skills. Given the need for more effective solutions in assessing fundamental basic skills in both children and adolescents, the present study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Fundamental Motor Skills test in sports (FUS) among Iranian children and adolescents.
Methods: This was a descriptive-correlation study with a cross-sectional design. A total number of 1500 children (750 girls and 750 boys) aged 7 to 14 with an average age of 10.63±2.54 were selected from eleven districts of Shiraz, Iran in the academic year of 2023-2024 through cluster sampling technique. For data collection, FUS test was used. The test was translated into Persian using an independent double-reverse translation method prior to its use. The content validity of the translated test was carefully verified and confirmed. Before testing each skill, the students were provided with a brief explanation about the importance and how to implement the skill. To analyze the data, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Pearson intraclass correlation coefficient, and One-sample t-test were employed. A significance level of α=0.05 was applied and the data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.
Results: The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that all fit indices, except for Comparative Fit Index (GFI), exceed the threshold of 0.90. The results of the impact score revealed that all subscales achieved a score of 1.5 or higher, indicating satisfactory face validity. The results of the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) demonstrated that all subscales of the FUS test met or exceeded the threshold specified by the Lawshe Table (0.62). The results of the Content Validity Index (CVI) similarly revealed that all subscales of the FUS test attained a CVI score exceeding 0.79. Both inter-rater (0.96-0.97) and intra-rater (exceeding 0.96) reliability demonstrated considerable to nearly complete agreement. Detective agreements for FUS assignments ranged from 79.6% to 94.5%. A moderate positive correlation was noted between the Ball bouncing task and both the Forward roll (r=0.35; P=0.004) and Throwing & Catching tasks (r=0.39; P=0.002). Other relationships were either below average. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values, ranging between 0.93 and 0.98, affirm outstanding test-retest reliability.
Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrated that the FUS test is both feasible and effective for use in school settings. Therefore, the FUS test holds promise in facilitating the enhancement of motor proficiency by offering a standardized and systematic means of evaluating Fundamental Motor Skills in school-age children and adults.

Highlights

Mohammad Hossein Zamani: (Google Scholar)

Ayoub Hashemi: (Google Scholar)

 

 

How to Cite: Zamani MH, Hashemi A, Siavashi E, Khanmohamadi R, Saeidi H. Validity and Reliability of the Fundamental Motor Skills in Sports (FUS) Test for Iranian Children and Adolescents. Int. J. School. Health. 2024;11(3):157-169. doi: 10.30476/INTJSH.2024.101089.1368.

Keywords

  1. Bardid F, Vannozzi G, Logan SW, Hardy LL, Barnett LM. A hitchhiker’s guide to assessing young people’s motor competence: Deciding what method to use. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(3):311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.08.007. PubMed PMID: 30166086. ##
  2. Logan SW, Ross SM, Chee K, Stodden DF, Robinson LE. Fundamental motor skills: A systematic review of terminology. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(7):781-796. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1340660. PubMed PMID: 28636423. ##
  3. Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, Lopes VP, Logan SW, Rodrigues LP, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1273-1284. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6. PubMed PMID: 26201678. ##
  4. Cattuzzo MT, dos Santos Henrique R, Ré AHN, de Oliveira IS, Melo BM, de Sousa Moura M, et al. Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.004. PubMed PMID: 25554655. ##
  5. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, Barnett LM, Okely AD. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits. Sports Med. 2010;40(12):1019-35. doi: 10.2165/11536850-000000000-00000. PubMed PMID: 21058749. ##
  6. Barnett LM, Webster EK, Hulteen RM, De Meester A, Valentini NC, Lenoir M, et al. Through the looking glass: A systematic review of longitudinal evidence, providing new insight for motor competence and health. Sports Med. 2022;52(4):875-920. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01516-8. PubMed PMID: 34463945; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8938405. ##
  7. Burns RD, Bai Y, Byun W, Colotti TE, Pfledderer CD, Kwon S, et al. Bidirectional relationships of physical activity and gross motor skills before and after summer break: Application of a cross-lagged panel model. J Sport Health Sci. 2022;11(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.001. PubMed PMID: 32652233; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9068551. ##
  8. Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA, Rudisill ME, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60(2):290-306. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582. ##
  9. Bolger LE, Bolger LA, O’Neill C, Coughlan E, O’Brien W, Lacey S, et al. Global levels of fundamental motor skills in children: A systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2021;39(7):717-753. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1841405. PubMed PMID: 33377417. ##
  10. De Meester A, Stodden D, Goodway J, True L, Brian A, Ferkel R, et al. Identifying a motor proficiency barrier for meeting physical activity guidelines in children. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.007. PubMed PMID: 28595871. ##
  11. Klingberg B, Schranz N, Barnett LM, Booth V, Ferrar K. The feasibility of fundamental movement skill assessments for pre-school aged children. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(4):378-386. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1504603. PubMed PMID: 30084306. ##
  12. Schoemaker MM, Niemeijer AS, Flapper BC, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery for children‐2 checklist for children with and without motor impairments. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04226.x. PubMed PMID: 22320829. ##
  13. Rudd JR, Barnett LM, Butson ML, Farrow D, Berry J, Polman RCJ. Fundamental movement skills are more than run, throw and catch: The role of stability skills. PloS one. 2015;10(10):e0140224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140224. PubMed PMID: 26468644; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4607429. ##
  14. Ulrich DA. TGMD-3: Test of gross motor development: Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2018. ##
  15. Tamplain P, Webster EK, Brian A, Valentini NC. Assessment of motor development in childhood: Contemporary issues, considerations, and future directions. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2019;8(2):391-409. doi: 10.1123/jmld.2018-0028. ##
  1. Webster EK, Ulrich DA. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the test of gross motor development—third edition. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2017;5(1):45-58. doi: 10.1123/jmld.2016-0003. ##
  2. Longmuir PE, Boyer C, Lloyd M, Borghese MM, Knight E, Saunders TJ, et al. Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA): Validity, objectivity, and reliability evidence for children 8–12 years of age. J Sport Health Sci. 2017;6(2):231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.11.004. PubMed PMID: 30356598; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6189007. ##
  3. Tyler R, Foweather L, Mackintosh KA, Stratton G. A dynamic assessment of children’s physical competence: The dragon challenge. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(12):2474-2487. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001739. PubMed PMID: 30067588; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6282672. ##
  4. Baghurst T, Richard K, Mwavita M, Ramos N. Procedures and reasoning for skill proficiency testing in physical education teacher education programs. Cogent Education. 2015;2(1):1111716. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2015.1111716. ##
  5. Eddy L, Hill LJ, Mon-Williams M, Preston N, Daly-Smith A, Medd G, et al. Fundamental movement skills and their assessment in primary schools from the perspective of teachers. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2021;25(3):236-249. doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2021.1874955. PubMed PMID: 34381304; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8300520. ##
  6. Eddy LH, Bingham DD, Crossley KL, Shahid NF, Ellingham-Khan M, Otteslev A, et al. The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review. PloS One. 2020;15(8):e0237919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237919. PubMed PMID: 32841268; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7447071. ##
  7. Scheuer C, Herrmann C, Bund A. Motor tests for primary school aged children: A systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(10):1097-1112. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1544535. PubMed PMID: 30604655. ##
  8. Makaruk H, Porter JM, Webster EK, Makaruk B, Bodasińska A, Zieliński J, et al. The fus test: a promising tool for evaluating fundamental motor skills in children and adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1912. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16843-w. PubMed PMID: 37789359; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10548572. ##
  9. Van Beurden E, Zask A, Barnett LM, Dietrich UC. Fundamental movement skills—how do primary school children perform? The ‘Move it Groove it’program in rural Australia. J Sci Med Sport. 2002;5(3):244-52. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(02)80010-x. PubMed PMID: 12413042. ##
  10. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975;28(4):563-575. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x. ##
  11. Waltz CF, Bausell BR. Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis: Davis Fa; 1981. ##
  12. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. ##
  13. Krajenbrink H, van Abswoude F, Vermeulen S, van Cappellen S, Steenbergen B. Motor learning and movement automatization in typically developing children: The role of instructions with an external or internal focus of attention. Hum Mov Sci. 2018;60:183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.06.010. PubMed PMID: 29945034. ##
  14. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33(2):363-74. PubMed PMID: 884196. ##
  15. Lander NJ, Hanna L, Brown H, Telford A, Morgan PJ, Salmon J, et al. Physical education teachers’ perspectives and experiences when teaching FMS to early adolescent girls. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2017;36(1):113-8. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2015-0201. ##
  16. Lander NJ, Barnett LM, Brown H, Telford A. Physical education teacher training in fundamental movement skills makes a difference to instruction and assessment practices. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2015;34(3):548-56. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2014-0043. ##
  17. O’Brien W, Philpott C, Lester D, Belton S, Duncan MJ, Donovan B, et al. Motor competence assessment in physical education–convergent validity between fundamental movement skills and functional movement assessments in adolescence. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2023;28(3):306-19. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2021.1990241. ##
  18. Roberton MA, Thompson G, Langendorfer SJ. Initial steps in creating a developmentally valid tool for observing/assessing rope jumping. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2017;22(2):1-10. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2016.1165193. ##
  19. Hao T, Xing G, Zhou G. RunBuddy: a smartphone system for running rhythm monitoring. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing; 2015. doi: 10.1145/2750858.2804293. ##
  20. Trecroci A, Cavaggioni L, Caccia R, Alberti G. Jump rope training: Balance and motor coordination in preadolescent soccer players. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;14(4):792-8. PubMed PMID: 26664276; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4657422. ##
  21. Steele J, Sheppard J. Landing mechanics in injury prevention and performance rehabilitation. Sports Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation: Routledge; 2015. p. 121-38. ##
  22. Park Y-S, Kang S-H, Lim Y-T. Development and verification of treatment programs by turn and roll types to improve the function of vestibular system. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2012;22(2):209-17. doi: 10.5103/KJSB.2012.22.2.209. ##
  23. Katsuhara Y, Fujii S, Kametani R, Oda S. Spatiotemporal characteristics of rhythmic, stationary basketball bouncing in skilled and unskilled players. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;110(2):469-78. doi: 10.2466/PMS.110.2.469-478. PubMed PMID: 20499557. ##
  24. Wagner H, Pfusterschmied J, Tilp M, Landlinger J, von Duvillard SP, Müller E. Upper‐body kinematics in team‐handball throw, tennis serve, and volleyball spike. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(2):345-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01503.x. PubMed PMID: 22813080. ##
  25. Van Waelvelde H, De Weerdt W, De Cock P, Engelsman BS. Ball catching. Can it be measured? Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2003;19(4):259-267. doi: 10.1080/09593980390246733. ##
  26. Kelly L, O’Connor S, Harrison AJ, Ní Chéilleachair NJ. Does fundamental movement skill proficiency vary by sex, class group or weight status? Evidence from an Irish primary school setting. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(9):1055-1063. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1543833. PubMed PMID: 30422061. ##