Document Type : Research Article (s)

Authors

1 Department of Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Art and Architecture Faculty of Engineering Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Environment and Urban Health, Tehran Research and Planning Center (TURPC), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Environmental factors significantly impact the quality of school open spaces, creating small-scale collective areas that can positively influence student health. Among these factors, thermal health is crucial in promoting well-being. This study aimed to investigate the influence of Sky View Factor (SVF) on physiological and mental thermal health of secondary school girls in Shiraz, Iran.
Methods: A quantitative structural research method was applied in this study. Physical health assessment was conducted using Standard Effective Temperature (SET) and physiological equivalent temperature (PET) models based on ASHRAE55 and ISO7730 standards. Mental Thermal Health was calculated using Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) models with Fanger equation. Digital thermometer, thermo- hygrometer, and anemometer Testo were used to collect temperature, humidity, and wind data on the 15th day of April until June 2022. Additionally, the radiation temperature was determined using Energy Plus v8/7. SVF for each station was determined through spherical photography with Nikon Coolpix 4500 camera. Thermal health simulations were carried out using Raymanv1.2. The correlation between SVF and thermal health values was examined using SPSS version 26.
Results: Among the six stations, Station 3 had the highest SVF (0/853) and was the warmest, while Station 2 had the lowest SVF (0/442) and was the coolest throughout the studied period. As SVF decreased, both physiological and mental thermal health values increased.
Conclusions: Resting areas near shady trees showed reduced SVF and improved students’ thermal health. Moreover, our results indicated that the impact of SVF on physiological thermal health was more significant than mental thermal health.

Highlights

Heidar Jahan Bakhsh: (Google Scholar)

 

 

How to Cite: Mirshamsi MS, Jahan Bakhsh H, Vafamehr M, Barzegar Z. The Influence of Sky View Factor Index on Thermal Health of Secondary Girl Students based on ASHRAE55 Standard: A Case Study in Shiraz, Iran. Int. J. School. Health. 2024;11(2):114-125. doi: 10.30476/INTJSH.2024.98865.1323.

Keywords

  1. Aghamolaei R, Azizi MM, Aminzadeh B, O’Donnell J. A comprehensive review of outdoor thermal comfort in urban areas: Effective parameters and approaches. Energy & Environment. 2022;34(6):2204-27. doi: 10.1177/0958305X221116176.
  2. Mohammadi M, Barzegar Z. The Impact of Wind on Ambient Temperature and Thermal Comfort through Wind Catcher by Employing PMV-A Case of Salehi's House in Shiraz, Iran. Iran IJAUP. 2019;29(2):213-222. doi: 10.22068/ijaup.29.2.213.
  3. Shrestha M, Rijal HB, Kayo G, Shukuya M. A field investigation on adaptive thermal comfort in school buildings in the temperate climatic region of Nepal. Building and Environment. 2021;190:107523. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107523.
  4. Zomorodian ZS, Aminian S, Tahbaz M. Thermal Comfort Assessment in Classrooms in the Hot and Dry Climate of Iran Field Survey in a Primary School of Kashan. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning. 2017;21(4):17-28. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2017.61653. Persian.
  5. Najafi N, Movahed K, Barzegar Z, Samani S. The effect of thermal comfort on stress in female high school students. Int J School Health. 2018;5(3):1-6. doi: 10.5812/intjsh.67539.
  6. Mansi SA, Barone G, Forzano C, Pigliautile I, Ferrara M, Pisello AL, et al. Measuring human physiological indices for thermal comfort assessment through wearable devices: A review. Measurement. 2021;183:109872. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109872.
  7. Enescu D. A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;79:1353-79. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.175.
  8. Jastaneyah Z, Kamar H, Al Garalleh H. A Review Paper on Thermal Comfort and Ventilation Systems in Educational Buildings: Nano-Mechanical and Mathematical Aspects. Journal of Nanofluids. 2023;12(1):1-17. doi: 10.1166/jon.2023.1902. doi: 10.1166/jon.2023.1902.
  9. Huang L, Zhai Z. Critical review and quantitative evaluation of indoor thermal comfort indices and models incorporating solar radiation effects. Energy and Buildings. 2020;224:110204. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110204.
  10. Kim J, Lee DK, Brown R, Kim S, Kim J-H, Sung S. The effect of extremely low sky view factor on land surface temperatures in urban residential areas. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2022;80:103799. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103799.
  11. ZarifianMehr A, Jahanshahloo L, Alijani B, Zabih H. A Review of the Definitions and Calculation Methods of Sky View Factor. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 2020;13(31):207-23. doi: 10.22034/AAUD.2020.132007.1537.
  12. Holmer B, Postgård U, Eriksson M. Sky view factors in forest canopies calculated with IDRISI. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 2001;68:33-40. doi: 10.1007/s007040170051.
  13. Dirksen M, Ronda RJ, Theeuwes NE, Pagani GA. Sky view factor calculations and its application in urban heat island studies. Urban Climate. 2019;30:100498. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100498.
  14. Wang R, Liu R, Chen Q, Cheng Q, Du M. Effects of Sky View Factor on Thermal Environment in Different Local Climate Zoning Building Scenarios—A Case Study of Beijing, China. Buildings. 2023;13(8):1882. doi: 10.3390/buildings13081882.
  15. Lam CKC, Weng J, Liu K, Hang J. The effects of shading devices on outdoor thermal and visual comfort in Southern China during summer. Building and Environment. 2023;228:109743. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109743.
  16. Khalili S, Fayaz R, Zolfaghari A. Analyzing outdoor thermal comfort conditions in a university campus in hot-arid climate: A case study in Birjand, Iran. Urban Climate. 2022;43:101128. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101128.
  17. Fanger PO. Assessment of man's thermal comfort in practice. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1973;30(4):313-24. doi: 10.1136/oem.30.4.313.
  18. Zhao Q, Lian Z, Lai D. Thermal comfort models and their developments: A review. Energy and Built Environment. 2021;2(1):21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.05.007.
  19. Fröhlich D, Matzarakis A. Calculating human thermal comfort and thermal stress in the PALM model system 6.0. Geoscientific Model Development. 2020;13(7):3055-3065. doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-3055-2020.
  20. Hardy JD, Stolwijk JAJ, Gagge AP. In: Whittow GC, editor. Mammals: Academic Press; 1971. p. 327-80.
  21. Taleghani M, Kleerekoper L, Tenpierik M, Van Den Dobbelsteen A. Outdoor thermal comfort within five different urban forms in the Netherlands. Building and Environment. 2015;83:65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.014.
  22. Olgyay V. Design with climate: bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism: Princeton University Press; 2015.
  23. Szokolay S. Thermal comfort and passive design. Engineering, Environmental Science. 1985. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9951-3_5.
  24. Givoni B. Man, climate and architecture. London: Applied Science Publishers; 1976. p. 483.
  25. Zare S, Hasheminejad N, Shirvan H, Hemmatjo R, Sarebanzade K, Ahmadi S. Comparing Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) with selected thermal indices/environmental parameters during 12 months of the year. Weather and Climate Extremes. 2018;19:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2018.01.004.
  26. Gagge AP, Stolwijk JAJ, Nishi Y. An effective temperature scale based on a simple model of human physiological regulatory response. Ashrae Trans. 1971;77:247-62.
  27. American National Standard. Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers; 2001.
  28. Sirhan N, Golan S. Efficient PMV computation for public environments with transient populations. Energy and Buildings. 2021;231:110523. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110523.
  29. Miao C, Yu S, Hu Y, Zhang H, He X, Chen W. Review of methods used to estimate the sky view factor in urban street canyons. Building and Environment. 2020;168:106497. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106497.
  30. Zeng L, Lu J, Li W, Li Y. A fast approach for large-scale Sky View Factor estimation using street view images. Building and Environment. 2018;135:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.009.
  31. Bernard J, Bocher E, Petit G, Palominos S. Sky view factor calculation in urban context: computational performance and accuracy analysis of two open and free GIS tools. Climate. 2018;6(3):60. doi: 10.3390/cli6030060.
  32. Shehata AM. Sustainable-Oriented Development for Urban Interface of Historic Centers. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2792. doi: 10.3390/su15032792.
  33. Jamali M, Moghimi E, Jafarpour ZA. Geomorphology of Karst features of Shiraz City and Arjan Plain and development limitations. International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering. 2015;9(1):25-31. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1338078.
  34. Lin T-P, Matzarakis A, Hwang R-L. Shading effect on long-term outdoor thermal comfort. Building and Environment. 2010;45(1):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.002.
  35. Omidvar K, Ebrahimi R, Jamshidi Motlagh M. Investigating the Effect of Sunspots on the Temperature of Kerman and Shiraz Stations during the Last Half Century Using Wavelet Analysis. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards. 2016;5(3):17-36. doi: 10.22067/geo.v5i3.41777. Persian.