International Journal of School Health

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Authorship Rules and Regulations

Indexing and Abstracting

Peer Review Process

Metrics

Forms

Association between Physical Activity and Motor Proficiency among Primary School Children

Document Type : Research Article (s)

Authors

1 Department of Physical Education, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Department of Physical Education, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran

3 Department of Physical Education, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran

Abstract

Background: Self-reported instruments have suggested that physical activity correlates with motor proficiency in children. However, due to inherent biases and low accuracy of self-reported instruments, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between objectively measured physical activity (via accelerometer) and motor proficiency in children.
Methods: This study is a descriptive-correlational investigation involving 384 children (comprising 192 boys and 192 girls), aged 7 to 9 years (with a mean age of 7.96±0.73 years). These participants were in the first and second grades from regular primary schools in Tehran, Iran, during 2022, and were selected through a convenience sampling method. We employed the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer for an objective measurement of physical activity. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency’s short form was used to evaluate the children’s motor proficiency. Data were analyzed using Independent t-test, Pearson correlation test, and multiple linear regression analysis.
Results: The children did not meet the WHO guidelines recommending 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day. Boys had significantly more MVPA than girls (P<0.001). The results revealed that sedentary time had a significant inverse relationship with both gross (r=-0.681, P<0.001) and fine (r=-0.584, P<0.001) motor skills. Moreover, objectively measured physical activity (via accelerometer) showed a direct and significant correlation with gross motor skills (r=0.710, P<0.001), but not with fine motor skills (r=0.064, P=0.307). Sedentary time significantly and inversely impacted both gross (β=-0.68) and fine motor skills (β=-0.58). Furthermore, objective physical activity (measured by accelerometer) had a direct and significant impact on gross motor skills (β=0.71).
Conclusions: These findings underscore the necessity to enhance the level of physical activity in children, particularly in girls. We also recommend that physical education teachers and sports coaches incorporate programs in their physical education lessons designed to facilitate motor skills development in children.

Highlights

How to Cite: Dana A, Ranjbari S, Chaharbaghi Z, Ghorbani S. Association between Physical Activity and Motor Proficiency among Primary School Children. Int. J. School. Health. 2023;10(3):128-135. doi: 10.30476/INTJSH.2023.98237.1295.

Keywords

References
1. Hernandez AM, Caçola P. Motor proficiency predicts cognitive ability in four-year-olds. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 2015;23(4):573–84. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2014.991094. ## 2. Logan SW, Scrabis-Fletcher K, Modlesky C, Getchell N. The relationship between motor skill proficiency and body mass index in preschool children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(3):442-8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599776. PubMed PMID: 21957702. ## 3. Brian A, Getchell N, True L, De Meester A, Stodden DF. Reconceptualizing and Operationalizing Seefeldt's Proficiency Barrier: Applications and Future Directions. Sports Med. 2020;50(11):1889-1900. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01332-6. PubMed PMID: 32930982. ## 4. Slotte S, Sääkslahti A, Metsämuuronen J, Rintala P. Fundamental movement skill proficiency and body composition measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in eight-year-old children. Early Child Development and Care. 2015;185(3):475-485. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2014.936428. ## 5. Venetsanou F, Kambas A. Motor proficiency in young children: a closer look at potential gender differences. Sage Open. 2016;6(1):1-10. doi: 10.1177/2158244015626226. ## 6. Morley D, Till K, Ogilvie P, Turner G. Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on the motor proficiency of children in the UK. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;44:150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.022. PubMed PMID: 26342797. ## 7. Wrotniak BH, Epstein LH, Dorn JM, Jones KE, Kondilis VA. The relationship between motor proficiency and physical activity in children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):e1758-65. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0742. PubMed PMID: 17142498. ## 8. Venetsanou F, Kambas A. Can Motor Proficiency in Preschool Age Affect Physical Activity in Adolescence? Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2017;29(2):254-259. doi: 10.1123/pes.2016-0119. PubMed PMID: 27705534. ## 9. Mukherjee S, Ting Jamie LC, Fong LH. Fundamental Motor Skill Proficiency of 6- to 9-Year-Old Singaporean Children. Percept Mot Skills. 2017;124(3):584-600. doi: 10.1177/0031512517703005. PubMed PMID: 28376671. ## 10. Gallotta MC, Baldari C, Guidetti L. Motor proficiency and physical activity in preschool girls: A preliminary study. Early Child Development and Care. 2018;188:1381–1391. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1261337. ## 11. De Meester A, Stodden D, Goodway J, True L, Brian A, Ferkel R, et al. Identifying a motor proficiency barrier for meeting physical activity guidelines in children. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.007. PubMed PMID: 28595871. ## 12. Sheikh M, Bay N, Ghorbani S, Esfahaninia A. Effects of Peers on Motivation and Physical Activity Behavior of Adolescent Students: An Investigation of Trans-Contextual Model. Int J School Health. 2021;8(1):47-54. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2021.90210.1129. ## 13. Sheikh M, Bay N, Ghorbani S, Esfahani nia A. Effects of Social Support and Physical Self-efficacy on Physical Activity of Adolescents. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2022;10(4):15823-15834. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2022.62762.4793. ## 14. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World Health Organization. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/336656. ## 15. Ghorbani S, Rezaeeshirazi R, Shakki M, Noohpisheh S, Farzanegi P. The role of BMI, physical activity and the use of electronic device in the status of trunk abnormalities in male adolescents. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2020;22(3):129-136. Persian. ## 16. Dana A, Asgari F, Hashemi M. Description of gross and fine motor skills for 9- and 10-years old children of Golestan province and comparison to each other. Middle East J Sci Res. 2011;8(2):401-406. ## 17. Dana A, Habibi Z, Hashemi M, Asghari A. A description and comparison of anthropometrical and physical fitness characteristics in urban and rural 7-11 years old boys and girls in Golestan Province, Iran. Middle East J Sci Res. 2011;8(1):231-236. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3947479. ## 18. Lahart I, Darcy P, Gidlow C, Calogiuri G. The Effects of Green Exercise on Physical and Mental Wellbeing: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(8):1352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081352. ## 19. Schwartz J, Rhodes R, Bredin S, Oh P, Warburton DER. Effectiveness of Approaches to Increase Physical Activity Behavior to Prevent Chronic Disease in Adults: A Brief Commentary. J Clin Med. 2019;8(3):295. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030295. PubMed PMID: 30832260; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6462966. ## 20. Dana A, Christodoulides E. The Effects of a Period of Selected Physical Activity on Improving Manipulative and Locomotors Skills of Children with Neuropsychological Learning Disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research. 2020;7(1):25-30. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2019.81592.1006. ## 21. Ghorbani S, Afshari M, Eckelt M, Dana A, Bund A. Associations between Physical Activity and Mental Health in Iranian Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Accelerometer-Based Study. Children. 2021;8(11):1022. doi: 10.3390/children8111022. ## 22. Abdoshahi M, Ghorbani S. Effects of Playground Availability on Participation of Children in Physical Activity: The Role of Socioeconomic Status. Int J School Health.2022;9(3):186-191. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2022.96051.1245. 23. Ghorbani S, Tayebi B, Deylami K, Rahmannia G, Shakki M. The Effect of Physical Education in Schools on the Motivation and Physical Activity Behavior of Adolescents: An Examination of the Trans-Contextual Model. Res Educ Sport. 2021;8(21):179-196. doi: 10.22089/res.2020.8805.1866. ## 24. Sallis JF, Bull F, Guthold R, Heath GW, Inoue S, Kelly P, et al. Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1325-36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30581-5. PubMed PMID: 27475270. ## 25. Abdi K, Hosseini FB, Chaharbaghi Z, Ghorbani S. Impact of Social Support on Wellbeing and Health-Related Quality of Life among Elderly Women: Mediating Role of Physical Activity. Women Health Bull. 2022;9(2):104-109. doi: 10.30476/whb.2022.94981.1174. ## 26. Hosseini FB, Charbaghi Z, Poshtiban K, Gholidahaneh M, Ghorbani S. Self-Esteem, Goal Orientation, Physical Self-Efficacy, and Health- Related Physical Fitness among Athletic and Non-Athletic Middle-School Students: a Comparative Study. Int J School Health. 2021;8(4):234-240. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2021.92872.1179. ## 27. Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(14):1557-65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196. PubMed PMID: 18949660. ## 28. Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency (BOT-2). Minneapolis: MN Pearson Assess; 2005. ## 29. Mohammadi Orangi B, Bahram A, Yaali R. The Comparison Effect of BMI And Age on Motor Proficiency in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. RJMS. 2018;25(9):74-83. Persian. ## 30. Abdullah B, Aziz WAA, Yusof A. Level of Motor Skill Development of Preschool Students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2016;16(Supplement Issue 2):1095-1098. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2016.s2175. ## 31. Ishii K, Shibata A, Adachi M, Nonoue K, Oka K. Gender and grade differences in objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns among Japanese children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1254. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2607-3. PubMed PMID: 26679503; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4683705. ## 32. Trost SG, Pate RR, Sallis JF, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M, et al. Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(2):350-5. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200202000-00025. PubMed PMID: 11828247. ## 33. Saller FVI, Khaled SM. Potential psychosocial influences on gender differences in physical activity among Qatari adolescents: A first insight through descriptive observation. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2019;24(2):234-251. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2018.1515087. ## 34. Lenhart CM, Hanlon A, Kang Y, Daly BP, Brown MD, Patterson F. Gender disparity in structured physical activity and overall activity level in adolescence: Evaluation of youth risk behavior surveillance data. ISRN Public Health. 2012;2012:674936. doi: 10.5402/2012/674936. ##
International Journal of School Health
Volume 10, Issue 3 - Serial Number 39
July 2023
Pages 128-135
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics