Document Type : Research Article (s)


1 Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran

2 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran


Background: Internet addiction disorder (IAD) has become a major global issue in the modern society. Adolescents may be more prone to IAD due to their particular conditions. The current study aimed to investigate the association of IAD with personality types and parenting styles among a sample of Iranian high school students.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 400 students (50% male), with a mean age of 15.5±1.7 years, were selected randomly from the high schools in Jahrom city, Fars Province of Iran, in 2020. In addition to the demographic information, each participant was asked to fill out three standard questionnaires concerning IAD, parenting style, and personality types. Logistic regression was used to measure the odds ratio and there was a 95% confidence interval regarding the relationship between the independent variables and IAD. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 17.
Results: According to the results of the study, 25.5% of the students had severe IAD. The results of the backward logistic regression showed that the adolescents whose fathers (OR: 13.39, CI: 5.34-23.56) and mothers (OR: 13.64, CI: 7.89-24.99) had a permissive parenting style, as well as those with the personality types of psychoticism (OR: 10.83, CI: 4.26-19-59) and neuroticism (OR: 20.65, CI: 10.06-34.91), were at a higher risk of IAD.
Conclusion: The present study revealed that certain personality types and parenting styles are associated with an increased risk of developing IAD in adolescents. These results could be considered to develop appropriate programs for the prevention and control of the problem at the national or regional levels.


1. Armstrong L, Phillips JG, Saling LL. Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2000;53(4):537-550. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0400. ## 2. Internet Usage Statistics [Internet]. Miniwatts Marketing Group; 2021 [c ited 2021 July 7]. Available from: ## 3. Wang L, Luo J, Gao W, Kong J. The effect of Internet use on adolescents’ lifestyles: A national survey. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28(6):2007-2013. doi :10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.007. ## 4. Chakraborty K, Basu D, Kumar KGV. Internet addiction: consensus, controversies, and the way ahead. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2010;20(3):123-32. PubMed PMID: 22348866. ## 5. Ceyhan E, Ceyhan AA, Gurcan A. The Validity and Reliability of the Problematic Internet Usage Scale. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 2007;7(1):411-416. ## 6. Poli R, Agrimi E. Internet addiction disorder: prevalence in an Italian student population. Nord J Psychiatry. 2012;66(1):55-9. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2011.605169. PubMed PMID: 21859396. ## 7. Suhail K, Bargees Z. Effects of excessive Internet use on undergraduate students in Pakistan. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006;9(3):297-307. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.297. PubMed PMID: 16780397. ## 8. Xiuqin H, Huimin Z, Mengchen L, Jinan W, Ying Z, Ran T. Mental health, personality, and parental rearing styles of adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010;13(4):401-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0222. PubMed PMID: 20712498. ## 9. Tao R, Huang X, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Li M. Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction. 2010;105(3):556-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02828.x. PubMed PMID: 20403001. ## 10. Kim K, Ryu E, Chon MY, Yeun EJ, Choi SY, Seo JS, et al. Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.02.005. PubMed PMID: 16427966. ## 11. Wang L, Luo J, Bai Y, Kong J, Luo J, Gao W, et al. Internet addiction of adolescents in China: Prevalence, predictors, and association with well-being. Addiction Research & Theory. 2013;21(1):62-9. ## 12. Grant JE, Potenza MN, Weinstein A, Gorelick DA. Introduction to behavioral addictions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010;36(5):233-41. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2010.491884. PubMed PMID: 20560821; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3164585. ## 13. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Binder JF. Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(3):959-66. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024. ## 14. Park SK, Kim JY, Cho CB. Prevalence of Internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. Adolescence. 2008;43(172):895-909. PubMed PMID: 19149152. ## 15. Christakis DA, Moreno MM, Jelenchick L, Myaing MT, Zhou C. Problematic internet usage in US college students: a pilot study. BMC Medicine. 2011;9:77. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-77. ## 16. Sariyska R, Reuter M, Bey K, Sha P, Li M, Chen Y-F, et al. Self-esteem, personality and Internet addiction: a cross-cultural comparison study. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014;61:28-33. ## 17. Esfandiari G. Mothers Parenting styles among the children with and without behavioral disorders and the influence of educational programs. [MSc Thesis]. Tehran; 1995. ## 18. Rahiminezhad A. Standardization of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire on Junior Boys and Girls of Tehran City. Journal of Psychology and Education. 2003;33:29-54. Persian. ## 19. Mohammadsalehi N, Mohammadbeigi A, Jadidi R, Anbari Z, Ghaderi E, Akbari M. Psychometric properties of the Persian language version of Yang Internet Addiction Questionnaire: an explanatory factor analysis. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4(3):e21560. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.21560. PubMed PMID: 26495253; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4609498. ## 20. Kashani BH, Nasrollahi Kasmani A, Sadipour E, Soltanifar M. Qualitative Study of Professionals’ Perspectives about Internet Public Policy in Iran. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 2017;17:235-45. ## 21. Munno D, Cappellin F, Saroldi M, Bechon E, Guglielmucci F, Passera R, et al. Internet Addiction Disorder: Personality characteristics and risk of pathological overuse in adolescents. Psychiatry Res. 2017;248:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.11.008. PubMed PMID: 27988425. ## 22. Spada MM. An overview of problematic Internet use. Addict Behav. 2014;39(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.007. PubMed PMID: 24126206. ## 23. Ko C-H, Yen J-Y, Yen C-F, Lin H-C, Yang M-J. Factors predictive for incidence and remission of internet addiction in young adolescents: a prospective study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(4):545-51. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9992. PubMed PMID: 17711363. ## 24. Lam LT. Risk factors of Internet addiction and the health effect of internet addiction on adolescents: a systematic review of longitudinal and prospective studies. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16(11):508. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0508-2. PubMed PMID: 25212714. ## 25. Floros G, Siomos K. Excessive Internet use and personality traits. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports. 2014;1(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s40473-014-0006-1. ## 26. Tosun LP, Lajunen T. Does Internet use reflect your personality? Relationship between Eysenck's personality dimensions and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26(2):162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.010. ## 27. Tan WK, Yang CY. Personality trait predictors of usage of Internet services. International Conference on Economics, Business Innovation. 2012;38:185-9. ## 28. Yan W, Li Y, Sui N. The relationship between recent stressful life events, personality traits, perceived family functioning and internet addiction among college students. Stress Health. 2014;30(1):3-11. doi: 10.1002/smi.2490. PubMed PMID: 23616371. ## 29. West R, Brown J. Theory of addiction. 2nd ed. The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. ## 30. Li D, Zhang W, Li X, Zhen S, Wang Y. Stressful life events and problematic Internet use by adolescent females and males: A mediated moderation model. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26:1199-1207. ## 31. Li H, Wang J, Wang L. A survey on the generalized problematic Internet use in Chinese college students and its relations to stressful life events and coping style. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2009;7(2):333-346. doi: 10.1007/s11469-008-9162-4. ## 32. Fisoun V, Floros G, Siomos K, Geroukalis D, Navridis K. Internet addiction as an important predictor in early detection of adolescent drug use experience—implications for research and practice. J Addict Med. 2012;6(1):77-84. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e318233d637. PubMed PMID: 22227578. ## 33. Mottram AJ, Fleming MJ. Extraversion, impulsivity, and online group membership as predictors of problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009;12(3):319-21. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0170. PubMed PMID: 19445635. ## 34. Öztürk E, Özmen SK. The relationship of self-perception, personality and high school type with the level of problematic internet use in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;65:501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.016. ## 35. Öztürk C, Bektas M, Ayar D, Öztornacı BÖ, Yağcı D. Association of personality traits and risk of internet addiction in adolescents. Asian Nurs Res. 2015;9(2):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2015.01.001. PubMed PMID: 26160240. ## 36. Zhou Y, Li D, Li X, Wang Y, Zhao L. Big five personality and adolescent Internet addiction: The mediating role of coping style. Addict Behav. 2017;64:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.009. PubMed PMID: 27543833. ## 37. Carver CS, Connor-Smith J. Personality and coping. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:679-704. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352. PubMed PMID: 19572784. ## 38. Valcke M, Bonte S, De Wever B, Rots I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education. 2010;55:454-64. ## 39. Zhang H, Li D, Li X. Temperament and Problematic Internet Use in Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model of Maladaptive Cognition and Parenting Styles. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2015;24:1886-1897. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-9990-8. ## 40. Cheung C-k, Yue XD, Wong DS-w. Addictive Internet Use and Parenting Patterns Among Secondary School Students in Guangzhou and Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2015;24(8):2301-2309. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-0033-2. ##